Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Collaborative governance model in the implementation of performance-based village fund allocation in Kalibandung Village, Kubu Raya Regency

by Firdaus Firdaus ORCID , Herilasti Pujiningsih ORCID , Ksatriawan Zaenuddin ORCID , Helen Puspita Sari ORCID , Anggun Pria Wibowo ORCID
Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025

Abstract

The Ecology-based District Budget Transfer Policy (TAKE) is an ecological fiscal innovation developed to link financial transfers between government levels and environmental performance at the village level. This study aims to analyze the implementation of TAKE policies in Kalibandung Village, Kubu Raya Regency, and examine the dynamics of collaboration between actors to support performance-based environmental governance. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this study explores the views and practices of various actors, including regional apparatus organizations (OPDs), village forest management institutions (LPHD), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and local communities. The analysis is carried out through thematic interpretations that place the Collaborative Governance Framework and Institutional Analysis and Development as the main theoretical lenses. The results of the study show that the implementation of TAKE is influenced by four collaborative dimensions: unequal initial conditions in terms of capacity and access to information; institutional design that is still top-down without deliberative space; strong facilitative leadership at the village level but not yet sustainable at the district level; and collaborative processes that take place partially and have not been institutionalized. These findings confirm that the success of ecological fiscal policies at the local level is not solely determined by the calculation of incentives and technical indicators but by the quality of social interactions, trust, and institutional design that enable collaboration and shared learning. This study contributes to strengthening the theory of Collaborative Governance in the context of village ecological fiscal policy and provides a direction for policy reform towards participatory and sustainable environmental governance.

References

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance In Theory And Practice. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 18(4), 543–571. Https://doi.org/10.1093/Jopart/Mum032
  2. Abdillah, A., Widianingsih, I., Buchari, R. A., & Nurasa, H. (2025). Adapting to climate change and multi-risk governance: toward sustainable adaptation and enhancing urban resilience—Indonesia. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06491-7
  3. Aguntar, Y., Aghni, P. P., Juliyani, A., Rohman, M. A., Albab, M. A. U., Pratiwi, A. D. I., & Ardiansyah, F. (2023). Mapping of Forest Fire Vulnerability Using Information Value Model in West Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 17(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v17i2.7977
  4. Anirwan, A. (2023). Urbanization and Climate Resilience: How is Vulnerability and Poverty in Makassar. Journal of Governance, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i2.18933
  5. Anto, A., Mappasere, F. A., & Chandra, D. (2024). Impacts and Challenges of Implementing Ecological Fiscal Transfers: A Systematic Literature Review of Indonesia’s Policies. Jurnal Public Policy, 10(3), 177. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v10i3.9415
  6. Awaluddin, M., Suwitri, S., & Slamet Santoso, R. (2024). Public Policy Vs Local Wisdom: Controlling Forest and Land Fires in West Kalimantan. AAPA-EROPA-AGPA-IAPA International Conference 2024 Towards World Class Bureaucracy, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2024.1189
  7. Bafadal, M. F., & Hestiantini, A. P. (2023). Kebijakan Pemerintah Kalimantan Barat Dalam Isu Lingkungan Kebakaran Hutan Dan Lahan (Karhutla) Tahun 2023. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 4528–4538. https://jinnovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/6785
  8. Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., Amarjargal, O., Borie, M., Cassola, R. S., Cruz-Trinidad, A., Droste, N., Haryanto, J. T., Kasymov, U., Kotenko, N. V., Lhkagvadorj, A., De Paulo, F. L. L., May, P. H., Mukherjee, A., Mumbunan, S., Santos, R., Tacconi, L., Verde Selva, G., … Zhou, K. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. In Nature Sustainability (Vol. 4, Issue 9, pp. 756–765). Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0
  9. Chen, M., Adam, N. A., Gulzar, F., Li, X., Azlarova, M., & Roos, B. (2025). Integrating ecological indicators into economic and financial decision-making management. Ecological Indicators, 174, 113482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113482
  10. Dewanti, E. (2021, October 1). Ecological Fiscal Transfers – sharing revenues to improve the lives of millions in Indonesia’s forest areas. UNDP Indonesia. https://www.undp.org/indonesia/news/ecological-fiscal-transfers-sharing-revenues-improve-lives-millions-indonesias-forest-areas
  11. Dicelebica, T. F., Akbar, A. A., & Jati, D. R. (2022). Identifikasi dan Pencegahan Daerah Rawan Bencana Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Gambut Di Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 20(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.20.1.115-126
  12. Elyta, E., & Rahman, I. (2019, September 17). Overcoming the Forest Fire in West Kalimantan: A Political Ecology Approach. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-4-2019.2287273
  13. Firdaus, F., Patriani, I., & Nafi’ah, B. A. (2025). Implementasi kebijakan transfer anggaran kabupaten berbasis ekologis (TAKE) melalui reformulasi alokasi dana desa di Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Dinamika Governance : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v15i3.5345
  14. Government of Kubu Raya Regency. (2023). Sustainable Commodities & Collaboration: Jurisdictional investment outlook: Kubu Raya Regency 2023. https://greengrowthhub.or.id/ggdocs/2023/05/Jurisdictional-Investment-Outlook-Kubu-Raya-Regency.pdf
  15. Hasan, K. (2024). Kualitas udara Indonesia: Memburuk pada tahun 2023 tanpa intervensi efektif dan terpicu El Niño. https://energyandcleanair.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ID-CREA_ID-AQ-decline-in-2023-due-to-lack-of-intervention-and-El-Nino.-What-about-2024.pdf
  16. Jumasani, D. Y. (2020, December 3). Pemkab Kubu Raya Meluncurkan Pembagian Insentif Fiskal dari kepada Pemerintah Desa. Pontianak.Tribunnews.Com. https://pontianak.tribunnews.com/2020/12/03/foto-pemkab-kubu-raya-meluncurkan-pembagian-insentif-fiskal-dari-kepada-pemerintah-desa
  17. Laksana, S., & Gustav, T. I. (2022). Ecological Fiscal Transfer Policy Reform For Sustainable Development: A Case Of Indonesia. The 5th International Congress on Economics, Finance & Energy (EFE’2022), 220–248. https://www.indexacademicdocs.org/confpaper/2/2022/14
  18. Liu, M., Xiong, Y., & Zhang, A. (2024). Can China’s Cross-Regional Ecological Fiscal Transfers Help Improve the Ecological Environment?—Evidence from Hubei Province. Land, 13(8), 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081132
  19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&redir_esc=y
  20. Munandar, A. (2020, November 26). Jejak Orang Utan Terakhir di Rimba Gambut Kalibandung. Pantaugambut.Id. https://pantaugambut.id/kabar/jejak-orang-utan-terakhir-di-rimba-gambut-kalibandung
  21. Munandar, A. (2021, March 21). Praktik buruk investasi merusak fungsi gambut hutan Kalibandung. Ekuatorial.Com. https://www.ekuatorial.com/2021/03/praktik-buruk-investasi-merusak-fungsi-gambut-hutan-kalibandung/
  22. Nasir, M. (2022). Protecting Forested Areas in Non-Forest Zone through The Ecological Fiscal Transfer Scheme in Indonesia: A case study from Kutai Timur district. Forest and Society, 6(1), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.19193
  23. Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.
  24. Prianto, A. L., & Abdillah, A. (2023). Vulnerable countries, resilient communities: climate change governance in the coastal communities in Indonesia. In Climate Change, Community Response and Resilience: Insight for Socio-Ecological Sustainability (pp. 135–152). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18707-0.00007-2
  25. Rahman, R. A., White, B., & Ma, C. (2024). The effect of growth, deforestation, forest fires, and volcanoes on Indonesian regional air quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142311
  26. Rajaraman, I., & Gupta, M. (2022). Fiscal Transfers for Forest Cover Aligning National and Subnational Objectives in a Federal Setting. Economic and Political Weekly, 57(1), 50–57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357671969
  27. Ring, I. (2008). Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 25(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.001
  28. Saputri, P. A., Dirgantari, N., Fakhruddin, I., & Kusbandiyah, A. (2025). Determinant Factors of Ecological Fiscal Transfer in Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(7), 2031–2044. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i07.p10
  29. Sugiarti, U. (2024, November 11). Indonesia Masuk Daftar Negara dengan Polusi Udara Tertinggi. Goodstats.id. https://goodstats.id/article/indonesia-masuk-daftar-negara-polusi-udara-tertinggi-zCaUx
  30. Sukomardojo, T., Patriani, I., Judijanto, L., Pratomo, S., Afrilia, U. A., & Sari, L. (2024). Greenflation in the Era of Energy Transition: New Implications for Sustainable Economic Policy. ENDLESS: International Journal of Futures Studies, 7(1). http://endless-journal.com/index.php/endless73
  31. Zainal, R. I., Taufik, A., & Kiemas, G. R. (2024). The Effectiveness of Fiscal Transfer of South Sumatra Province: Initiation of Ecological Fiscal Transfer Concept. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i14.16095