Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Reforming teacher salary policy to strengthen human capital development in Indonesia 2045

by Nafis Dwi Kartiko , Alex Oktobertus Pandapotan Gultom

Abstract

This study aims to explore teacher salary schemes as a strategic instrument for strengthening human capital formation in the context of Indonesia Emas 2045. This study uses a qualitative approach to understand the relationship between teacher compensation and human capital quality through a conceptual and contextual analysis. The literature review method was chosen because it systematically examines theories, empirical findings, and regulatory frameworks. The main sources of research include laws and regulations governing teacher welfare, official reports from state institutions such as the Central Statistics Agency and the Ministry of Education, and international publications, including the OECD, which provide cross-country comparative data. The data collection strategy involved selecting documents with high credibility, direct relevance, and up-to-date information, which were then analyzed using content analysis techniques that emphasized categorization, interpretation, and synthesis. The results of the study show that teacher salary policy reform is a strategic prerequisite for strengthening the quality of human capital and accelerating Indonesia's competitiveness. Evidence from the 2022 PISA results, which show a decline in mathematics, reading, and science achievement, confirms the urgency of improving instructional quality based on teacher welfare and professionalism in Indonesia. Human capital theory explains that investing in educators as knowledge producers can increase productivity and drive long-term growth through skill accumulation and innovation diffusion. Literature findings show that adequate compensation strengthens motivation, retention, and pedagogical commitment, whereas low salaries correlate with a decline in teaching performance and student engagement.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/508733
  2. Abraham, K. G., & Mallatt, J. (2022). Measuring Human Capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(3), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.3.103
  3. Agusniati, A. (2022). The Effect of Education Finance on the Quality of Education in Indonesia. Devotion Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.36418/dev.v4i1.354
  4. Bassi, L. J., & McMurrer, D. P. (2008). Toward a Human Capital Measurement Methodology. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(6), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308325611
  5. Bowen, D. H., & Mills, J. N. (2017). Changing the Education Workforce? The Relationships Among Teacher Quality, Motivation, and Performance Pay. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900403
  6. Buchanan, J. (2012). Telling Tales Out of School: Exploring Why Former Teachers Are Not Returning to the Classroom. Australian Journal of Education, 56(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411205600207
  7. Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011). Does Human Capital Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Human Capital and Firm Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022147
  8. Dar, I. A., & Mishra, M. (2019). Human Capital and SMEs Internationalization: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale. Global Business Review, 22(3), 718–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918817390
  9. Deni̇z, S., Doğan, U., & Şahin, N. (2018). Reasons of Preservice Teachers Attending the Pedagogical Formation Certificate Program for Choosing Teaching as a Profession. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.335442
  10. Filippova, O. V, Grigoriev, A. V, Murzagalina, G. M., Sorgutov, I. V, Latifzoda, D. N., & Kalimullin, D. D. (2021). Trends in Economic Development and Education of Future Economists. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1842
  11. Findlay, J., Findlay, P., & Stewart, R. (2013). Occupational Pay Comparisons – Easier Said Than Done? Employee Relations, 36(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-05-2013-0056
  12. Gemeda, F. T., & Tynjälä, P. (2015). Exploring Teachers’ Motivation for Teaching and Professional Development in Ethiopia: Voices From the Field. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v5i2.7459
  13. Han, S. W., & Borgonovi, F. (2020). Students’ Teaching Career Expectations by Gender and Ability Levels in Science and Math: The Role of Salary and Numeracy Skills. European Journal of Education, 55(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12407
  14. Han, S. W., Borgonovi, F., & Guerriero, S. (2017). What Motivates High School Students to Want to Be Teachers? The Role of Salary, Working Conditions, and Societal Evaluations About Occupations in a Comparative Perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217729875
  15. Hou, L., & Wang, X. J. (2015). The Impact of Human Capital on the Beijing Economic Growth. https://doi.org/10.2991/itms-15.2015.406
  16. Ihsan, I., & Supaat, S. (2023). The Economic Dimension in the Educational Activities (The Role of Economy in Education and Education in the Economic Development). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 06(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i6-16
  17. Javalgi, R. G., & Todd, P. R. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Management Commitment, and Human Capital: The Internationalization of SMEs in India. Journal of Business Research, 64(9), 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.024
  18. Lavy, V. (2009). Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1979–2011. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.5.1979
  19. Liang, G., & Akiba, M. (2011). Performance-Related Pay: District and Teacher Characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 21(6), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461102100605
  20. Liang, X. (2024). Educational Inequalities Due to Regional Differences in China, Exemplified by Yunnan and Guangdong Provinces: An Analysis Based on Socio-Economic, Cultural Context and Policy Factors. Communications in Humanities Research, 49(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/49/20240187
  21. Liu, T., Su, B., Wang, J., & Rozelle, S. (2024). Can a Teacher Salary Increase Promote Students’ Educational Performance? China & World Economy, 32(4), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12543
  22. Manuelli, R. E., & Seshadri, A. (2014). Human Capital and the Wealth of Nations. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2736–2762. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2736
  23. Márquez‐Ramos, L., & Mourelle, E. (2019). Education and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Nonlinearities. Applied Economic Analysis, 27(79), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-06-2019-0005
  24. Messinis, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2009). Human Capital, Innovation and Technology Diffusion. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1487951
  25. OECD. (2016). Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, OECD Skills Studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en
  26. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  27. OECD. (2021). OECD Economic Surveys: Indonesia 2021. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/fd7e6249-en
  28. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results Indonesia. In OECD. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/malaysia-1dbe2061/
  29. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
  30. OECD. (2024). Survei Ekonomi OECD Indonesia.
  31. Ogurtsova, E., Firsova, А., & Chelnokova, O. Y. (2018). Regional Higher Education Systems and Sustainable Regional Economic Development: Functional Approach. https://doi.org/10.2991/cssdre-18.2018.126
  32. Rice, J. K., Malen, B., Baumann, P., Chen, E., Dougherty, A. J., Hyde, L., Jackson, C., Jacobson, R., & McKithen, C. (2012). The Persistent Problems and Confounding Challenges of Educator Incentives. Educational Policy, 26(6), 892–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812465708
  33. Rusina, H. (2022). Education Financing and Assessment in Improving the Quality of Education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education (Injoe), 3(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i2.26
  34. Saeed, N., & Kayani, A. I. (2018). Role of College Principals in Promoting Quality of Education in District Kotli AJ&K. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.137.2018.22.149.158
  35. Sianesi, B., & Reenen, J. V. (2003). The Returns to Education: Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 157–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00192
  36. Sun, Z. (2021). An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Education and Economic Development Based on PVAR Model. Scientific Programming, 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6052182
  37. Tavares, P. A., & Ponczek, V. (2019). Teacher Pay and Student Performance: Evidence From Brazil. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 38(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.12660/bre.v38n22018.73437
  38. Teles, V. K., & Andrade, J. (2008). Public Investment in Basic Education and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(4), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580810895635
  39. Valero, A., & Reenen, J. V. (2016). The Economic Impact of Universities: Evidence From Across the Globe. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22501
  40. Vidotto, J. D. F., Ferenhof, H. A., Selig, P. M., & Bastos, R. C. (2017). A Human Capital Measurement Scale. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-08-2016-0085
  41. Vuong, H. T. P., Tran, G. T. H., Ha, Q. Van, & Pham, H. T. (2024). Teacher policies in Southeast Asia: A comprehensive review and recommendations for Vietnam. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(9), 2024195. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024195
  42. Wangchuk, C., & Dorji, J. (2020). Teacher Attrition: The Former Teachers’ Perspectives in the Bhutanese Context. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v11i430299
  43. Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-Country Evidence on Teacher Performance Pay. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.008
  44. Xing-yang, Y. U., & Liu, M. (2021). Relationship Between Human Capital and Technological Innovation Growth of Regional Economy and Psychology of New Entrepreneurs in Northeast China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731284
  45. Yuan, K., Le, V., McCaffrey, D. F., Marsh, J. A., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Springer, M. G. (2013). Incentive Pay Programs Do Not Affect Teacher Motivation or Reported Practices. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712462625
  46. Zhang, W., & Zixuan Lu. (2022). Public Education Expenditure and Regional Economic Development. Journal of Innovation and Social Science Research, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.53469/jissr.2022.09(09).32