Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Key factor driving coastal governance policy in Indonesia from a knowledge-based governance perspective

by Elvi Nur Nujumul Laila ORCID , Dina Suryawati ORCID , Abul Haris Suryo Negoro ORCID , Yola Rezki Handika ORCID , Muhammad Iqbal Maulana ORCID
Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): October 2025

Abstract

Coastal governance policies in Indonesia have undergone significant changes over time, influenced by dynamic knowledge development. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of coastal and small island governance policies in Indonesia using a Knowledge-Based Governance approach. The method used was qualitative content analysis of 67 regulations issued by the Indonesian government between 1960 and 2024. The results show that the knowledge gained in coastal zone management comes mostly from reflections on the past and the present. Dialectical learning involving public consultation and discussions among stakeholders is limited and has not been widely implemented. Co-evolution, in which stakeholders, knowledge, and institutions interact dynamically, is a key factor in creating policies that are responsive to environmental challenges. This study suggests that the government strengthen inter-agency coordination and increase the participation of the community and relevant parties in the decision-making process. This is useful for creating policies that are more flexible and adaptive to changes. Therefore, it is important to integrate learning that involves various perspectives to produce policies that are more innovative, comprehensive, and in line with the needs of Indonesia's coastal communities.

References

  1. Assche, K.Van, Beunen, R., & Duineveld , M. (2014). Evolutionary Governance Theory: An Introduction. Peloncat. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00984-1
  2. Central Statistics Agency (BPS). (2022). Statistics on marine and coastal resources 2022. Central Statistics Agency.
  3. National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas). (2020). SDGs Report 2020. National Development Planning Agency
  4. Beunen R, Assche Kristof, & Duineveld M. (2014). Evolutionary Governance Theories and Applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12274-8
  5. Dye, TR, Columbus, B., New, I., San, Y., Cape, FA, Dubai, T., Madrid, L., Munich, M., Montréal, P., Delhi, T., São, MC, Sydney, P., Kong, H., Singapore, S., & Tokyo, T. (2017). Understanding Public Policy Fifteenth Edition. www.pearsoned.com/permissions/.
  6. Erwin Schwella; Knowledge-based governance, governance as learning: leadership implications. International Journal of Leadership in Public Service, May 6, 2014; 10 (2): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLPS-05-2014-0004
  7. Franke van der Molen., Daniel Puente-Rodríguez., Jac. AA Swart., Henny J. van der Windt. (2015). Co-production of knowledge and policy in coastal governance: Integrating shellfish fisheries and nature restoration. Marine & Coastal Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.012
  8. Foss, NJ, & Mahoney, JT (2010). Exploring Knowledge Governance. Center for Strategic Management and Globalization. SMG Working Paper No. 4/2010
  9. Gerlak A.K., Heikkila T., Smonlinski S.L., Huitema D., Armitage D. (2018). Learning our way out of Environmental Policy Problems: A Review of The Scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 335-371
  10. Haudi . (2021). Introduction to Government Science . Indonesia. Insan Cendekia Mandiri
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press
  12. Khoiril, OP., Priambodo, B. (2025). Collaborative Governance Model in Waste Reduction Efforts in Jombang Regency. Journal of Governance and Social Policy. 6 (1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v6i1.45998
  13. Liu, L., & Li, Y. (2017). "Knowledge governance in organizations: A theoretical framework and applications." Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1080-1096.
  14. Moyson S., Scholten P., Weible CM. (2017). Policy Learning and Change: Theorizing Their Relations from Different Perspectives. Policy and Society, 36(2), 161-177
  15. Qian Zhou, Shuxiang Wang, Liya Wang, Wei Xu; Knowledge governance and innovation ambidexterity in a platform context: exploring the role of knowledge transformation. Journal of Knowledge Management March 27, 2025; 29 (4): 1301–1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2024-0256
  16. Rozikin, M., Prayana, LH., Tabali, FJ. (2024). Participatory Waste Management Governance in Small Island Tourism Destinations: A Case Study of Gili Trawangan. Journal of Governance and Social Policy 5 (2) 148-172. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v5i2.42559
  17. Suryanto, J., Rahmayanti, AZ, Purwanto, P., & Nadjib, M. (2023). Building Partnerships for Social Innovation in Rural Development: A Case Study in Coastal Villages in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1153 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1153/1/012020
  18. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021). Pollution to solutions: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. United Nations Environment Programme.
  19. Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Verweij, S., Evans, J., & Gruezmacher, M. (2022). Policy Learning and Adaptation in Governance: A Co-Evolutionary Perspective. Administration & Society, 54(7), 1226–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211059165
  20. Van Assche, K., Hornidge, AK, Schlüter, A., & Vaidianu, N. (2020). Governance and Coastal Conditions: Towards a New Mode of Observation, Adaptation, and Integration. Marine Policy, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Marpol.2019.01.002
  21. Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Verweij, S. (2020). Learning from other places and their plans: Comparative learning in and for planning systems. Urban Planning, 5 (1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2938
  22. Veshkaei Nejad, SS, Doustar, M., Malekakhlagh, E., & Yakideh, K. (2024). Designing a knowledge-based governance model in executive organizations. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(2), 11-42. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1709
  23. Whoolf, NH, & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative Analysis Using Nvivo Five Levels Qda Method. (J. Morse, Ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. www.routledge.com
  24. Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, BM (2017). Application of Social Research Methods to Problems in Information Science and Library Science: Qualitative Content Analysis. California: Libraries Unlimited.
  25. Zhao, G., Hui, X., Lu, Y. et al. Advances in adaptive governance research and hotspot analysis: a global scientometric visualization analysis. Discov Sustain 5, 234 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00435-8