Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Psychosocial transformation of the deaf community through inclusive empowerment programs: A case study of the PERINTIS CSR Program at PT. Kilang Pertamina International RU VI Balongan

by Milly Mildawati ORCID , Versanudin Hekmatyar ORCID , Ade Subarkah ORCID , Dede Kuswanda ORCID , Tukino Tukino ORCID , Eko Gunawan Wibisosno ORCID , Fachry Arsyad ORCID , Mohamad Zulkifli ORCID , Andromedo Cahyo Purnomo ORCID , ⁠Shafira Putri Kusuma P ORCID
Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025

Abstract

The deaf community in Indonesia continues to face psychosocial challenges that extend beyond communication barriers, including low self-esteem, limited social participation, and social stigma. While many Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives focus on economic outcomes, little is known about their impact on psychosocial well-being. This study explores the psychosocial transformation experienced by members of the Deaf community through the PERINTIS Program, a CSR initiative of PT. Kilang Pertamina International RU VI Balongan, Indonesia. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with the program participants, parents, and the implementation team. A three-stage thematic analysis (open, axial, and selective coding) was conducted. The findings indicate that prior to joining the program, the participants often showed signs of withdrawal, low confidence, and emotional instability. After engaging in barista training and mentoring within an inclusive community space, the participants reported increased confidence, stronger social relationships, improved emotional regulation, and greater motivation for the future. These changes were facilitated by a strengths-based, gradual empowerment process supported by mentors and an inclusive social environment. This study highlights the importance of integrating psychosocial dimensions into CSR initiatives, showing that empowerment goes beyond technical skill-building to include identity reconstruction and social recognition. The results contribute to disability studies, social work practice, and CSR policy and suggest that similar community-based models may foster more sustainable and inclusive empowerment.

References

  1. Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  2. Barnes, C. (2005). Independent living, politics and policy in the United Kingdom: A social model account. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 1(4), 5–13. https://rdsjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/366
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif dan desain Riset. Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  6. Dethmers, N., Knoors, H., Vissers, C., van Gelder, H., & Hermans, D. (2025). Screening for psychological problems in deaf and hard of hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdsade/enaf017
  7. du Feu, M., & Fergusson, K. (2003). Sensory impairment and mental health. In Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 95–103). https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.9.2.95
  8. Erikson, E. H. (1968). On the Nature of Psycho-Historical Evidence: In Search of Gandhi. Daedalus, 97(3), 695–730. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20023839
  9. Karomalloh, A. D. (2024). Disabilitas dan Tantangan di Dunia Kerja. Kementerian Sosial RI. https://kemensos.go.id/jurnal-dan-artikel/direktorat-jenderal-pemberdayaan-sosial/Disabilitas-dan-Tantangan-di-Dunia-Kerja
  10. Kusters, A., De Meulder, M., & O’Brien, D. (2017). Innovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=dACpDgAAQBAJ
  11. Ladd, Paddy. (2003). Understanding deaf culture: in search of deafhood. Multilingual Matters.
  12. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
  13. Reindal, S. M. (2008). A social relational model of disability: A theoretical framework for special needs education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250801947812
  14. Saleebey, D. (1996). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice: Extensions and Cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296–305. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23718172
  15. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 69. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/37580/uu-no-8-tahun-2016
  16. WHO. (2011). World Report on Disability 2011. World Health Organization.
  17. Zarb, G. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780161
  18. Zastrow, C. (2017). Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare: Empowering People. Cengage Learning.