Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Transhumanistic cybercrime analysis using a posthuman criminology approach to digital identity threats in artificial intelligence era

by Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro ORCID , Muhammad Kuttub Firdausy

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence has disrupted conventional legal assumptions about identity, subjectivity, and criminal responsibility. This study investigated the normative and systemic inadequacies of Indonesia’s legal system in responding to transhumanistic cybercrime, particularly involving the manipulation of digital identities. Employing a normative juridical method and incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study critically analyzes structural, substantive, and cultural inertia within the legal framework. Drawing on Lawrence Friedman’s legal system theory and post-human criminology, this study identifies a deep ontological crisis wherein non-human actors and synthetic identities remain legally unrecognized. A comparative analysis of the European Union, the United States, Estonia, and Japan illustrates the varying degrees of legal adaptation, from algorithmic accountability to digital identity sovereignty. The findings reveal that Indonesia lacks a coherent legal regime to address algorithm-driven harm or recognize digital identity as an autonomous legal subject. The study proposes legal reforms that include establishing a dedicated legal framework for digital identity protection, extending criminal liability to autonomous systems, and integrating post-human perspectives into legal education. In the age of algorithmic governance, law must transcend biological essentialism to remain legitimate, responsive, and just.

References

  1. Aal, E. B. W. (2022). The Significance of Luhmann’s Theory on Organisations for Project Governance. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100070
  2. Abrar Adhani, Achmad Nashrudin P., & Ade Putranto Prasetyo Wijiharto Tunggali. (2017). Komunikasi Berkemajuan dalam Dinamika Media dan Budaya. Asosiasi Pendidikan Ilmu Komunikasi Perguruan Tinggu Muhammadiyah bekerjasama dengan Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo dan Buku Litera.
  3. Adnasohn Aqilla Respati, A. D. S. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pencegahan Kasus Deepfake Serta Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.12508126
  4. Agustin, S. M. (2019). Digital Body: Horcrux of Extended Self in Post-Human Era. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v7i3.10111
  5. Aini, N., & Lubis, F. (2024). Tantangan Pembuktian dalam Kasus Kejahatan Siber. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 55–63.
  6. Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Sistem Hukum Modern Lawrance M. Friedman: Budaya Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat dari Industrial ke Digital. Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.358
  7. Alghazali, M. S. D., & Siagian, A. W. (2024). Mutual Legal Assistance as an Instrument for the Eradication of Transnational Crime in the Field of Taxation. AML/CFT Journal The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2024.v3i1.66
  8. Anggen Suari, K. R., & Sarjana, I. M. (2023). Menjaga Privasi di Era Digital: Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 6(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4484
  9. Ansaroudi, Z. E., Carbone, R., Sciarretta, G., & Ranise, S. (2023). Control is Nothing Without Trust a First Look into Digital Identity Wallet Trends. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37586-6_7
  10. Beryl Helga Fredella Hibatulloh. (2025). Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap AI (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kriminologi. Tarunalaw: Journal of Law and Syariah, 3(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v3i01.300
  11. Cahyono, S. T., Erni, W., Hidayat, T., & Trisakti, U. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kejahatan Siber (Cybercrime) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Dame Journal Hukum, 1(1), 1–23.
  12. Campione, R. (2025). The Legal-Digital Metamorphosis of the Individual. Philosophies, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010002
  13. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2025). Ethics in the World of Automated Algorithmic Decision-Making—A Posthumanist Perspective. Information and Organization, 35(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100587
  14. Constantin, N., & Sitorus, F. (2024). Autopoiesis: Komunikasi dan Implementasi pada Era Modern dalam Perspektif Niklas Luhmann. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(8), 2609–2618. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v4i8.2742
  15. Cornelia Riehle. (2022). Europol Report Criminal Use of Deepfake Technology. Eucrim. https://eucrim.eu/news/europol-report-criminal-use-of-deepfake-technology/
  16. Danrivanto Budhijanto. (2025). Teori Hukum Digital (Lex Digitalis). Logoz Publishing.
  17. Dwi Kurniawan, K., & Indri Hapsari, D. R. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Vicarious Liability Theory. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5
  18. Endang Purwaningsih. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sonpedia Publishing.
  19. Fajar, M., Kambodji, A. B., & Musdar, I. A. (2023). Implementasi Algoritma Advanced Encryption Standard untuk Pengamanan Data Pengguna Aplikasi Media Sosial VirCle. Jurnal Algoritma, 20(2), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.20-2.1466
  20. Fauzi, E., & Radika Shandy, N. A. (2022). Hak Atas Privasi dan Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss3.art1
  21. Firman, F. A. (2018). Kebijakan Pertahanan Cyber Estonia Dalam Merespon Tindakan Cyber Sabotage Oleh Rusia Kepada Estonia. Universitas Komputer Indonesia.
  22. Gemilang, H. F. (2025). Meninjau Ilmu Digital Forensik Terhadap Bukti Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Perahu (Penerangan Hukum): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.51826/perahu.v12i2.984
  23. Gilani, S. (2021). Bionic Bodies, Posthuman Violence and the Disembodied Criminal Subject. Law and Critique, 32(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09284-6
  24. Ida Bagus Wisnuputra Raditya & I Dewa Gede Dana Sugama. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Asas Fiksi Hukum dari Prespektif Hukum Pidana Dalam Kasus Illegal Logging di Probolingo. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i1.3409
  25. Jaya, F., & Goh, W. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Kecerdasan Buatan atau Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum pada Hukum Positif Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum, 17(02), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v17i2.1287
  26. Kadek Ayu Widya Arisanthi. (2025). Hak Atas Privasi dalam Pengelolaan Digital Legacy Pascakematian sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hak Asasi. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora, 2(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.1672
  27. Kadir, Z. K. (2025). Kejahatan Berbasis Identitas Digital: Menggagas Kebijakan Kriminal untuk Dunia Metaverse. Jurnal Litigasi AMSIR, 12(2), 124–137.
  28. Kevin D. Haggerty & Daniel Trottier. (2015). Surveillance and/of Mature: Monitoring Beyond the Human. Society & Animals, 23(4), 400–420.
  29. King, T. C., Aggarwal, N., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0
  30. Li, Y. (2019). The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: Toughest U.S. Data Privacy Law with Teeth? Loyola Consumer Law Review, 32(1), 177–192.
  31. Luhur, K. B., Trihartono, A., & Hara, A. E. (2025). Navigating Digital Frontiers: Estonia’s e-Residency through the Lens of the Eclectic Paradigm. Jurnal Global Strategis, 19(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.19.1.2025.121-142
  32. Mahameru, D. E., Nurhalizah, A., Wildan, A., Haikal, M., & Rahmadia, M. H. (2023). Implementasi UU Perlindungan Data Pribadi Terhadap Keamanan Informasi Identitas di Indonesia. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 5(2), 115–131.
  33. Mark Taylor & Mireille Meissner. (2019). Agency and the Posthuman Shape of Law. Springer.
  34. Mawlidy, E. R., Primasatya, R. D., & Lorensa, L. (2024). Kemampuan Artificial Intelligence Terhadap Pendeteksian Fraud: Studi Literatur. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(1), 89–104.
  35. Muhammad Singgih Imam Wibowo, Akhmad Munawar, & Hidayatullah. (2024). Kendala Teknis dan Hukum dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Siber di Indonesia. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(7), 1–15.
  36. Nimerodi Gulo & Cornelius Dikae Zolohefona Gulo. (2024). Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Peradilan Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8115–8122. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3
  37. Nitaria Angkasa. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Sebagai Suatu Pengantar. CV Laduny Aliftam.
  38. Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (2024). Against Posthumanism: Notes towards an Ethopolitics of Personhood. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231178472
  39. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). The Future of Cybersecurity: Threats, Challenges, and Innovations. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://institute.ojk.go.id/ojk-institute/id/capacitybuilding/upcoming/4776/the-future-of-cybersecurity-threats-challenges-and-innovations
  40. Patricia Morisa Banfatin, Karolus Kopong Medan, & Debi F.Ng. Fallo. (2024). Pengaturan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Deepfake Dalam Melakukan Tindak Pidana Cybercrime. Pemuliaan Keadilan, 2(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i1.402
  41. Praja, C. B. E., Nurjaman, D., Fatimah, D. A., & Himawati, N. (2016). Strict Liability Sebagai Instrumen Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan. Varia Justicia, 12(1), 42–62.
  42. Puspita Sari, A., & Harwika, D. M. (2022). Legal Liability of Artificial Intelligence in Perspective of Civil Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(2), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i2.191
  43. Putri, K. V. K. (2021). Kerja Sama Indonesia dengan ASEAN Mengenai Cyber Security dan Cyber Resilience dalam Mengatasi Cyber Crime. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(7), 542–554.
  44. Rahmawati, D. S., Rosadi, S. D., & Cahyadini, A. (2025). Implementasi Pelindungan Data Pribadi Berupa Nomor Induk Kependudukan (NIK) dan Nomor Pokok Wajib Pajak (NPWP) pada Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(2), 739–749.
  45. Ravizki, E. N. & Lintang Yudhantaka. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Tinjauan Konseptual dan Tantangan Pengaturan di Indonesia. Notaire, 5(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i3.39063
  46. Ricciardi Celsi, L., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2025). Perspectives on Managing AI Ethics in the Digital Age. Information, 16(4), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040318
  47. Robertus Robet & U Abdul Rozak R. (2023). Konstruktivisme Bruno Latour dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ide Keagenan Sosiologi. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 28(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v28i2.13565
  48. Sandoval, M.-P., De Almeida Vau, M., Solaas, J., & Rodrigues, L. (2024). Threat of Deepfakes to the Criminal Justice System: A Systematic Review. Crime Science, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-024-00239-1
  49. Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2023). Behavioral Analysis of Cybercrime: Paving the Way for Effective Policing Strategies. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100034
  50. Sih Yuliana Wahyuningtyas, Yerik Afrianto Singgalen, & Enny Widawati. (2025). Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) dan Portabilitas Data Biometrik dalam Teknologi Imersif. Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia.
  51. Sirait, Y. H. (2019). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) dan Kedaulatan Negara Non-Uni Eropa. Gorontalo Law Review, 2(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704
  52. Tabiu, R., Heryanti, Intan, N., & Safiuddin, S. (2023). Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisasi. Halu Oleo Law Review, 7(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v7i1.11
  53. Veridas. (2024). Veridas Identity Fraud Report. Veridas. https://veridas.com/en/identity-fraud-report/
  54. Wendy, W., Alinurdin, D., & Sekolah Tinggi Teologi SAAT, Malang. (2021). Optimisme yang Tidak Menjanjikan: Kajian terhadap Transhumanisme dari Perspektif Antropologi Kristen. Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan, 20(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v20i1.408
  55. Zuchri Abdussamad. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Syakir Media Press.
  56. Zul Khaidir Kadir. (2025). Fear and Control: Rethinking Criminal Policy through the Lens of Moral Panic. International Journal of Law Analytics (IJLA), 3(2), 201–218.