Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Reconfiguring digital education policy through youth leadership to support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals

by Muhammad Irsad Maulana Khilman Asy-Syafi'i ORCID , Moh Fadhli Romadhon ORCID , Natia Natia ORCID , Indi Ramadhani Sitorus ORCID , Zalfa Afrillia ORCID
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): March 2026

Abstract

Digital education inequality remains a major challenge in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 4, 9, 10, and 17. Educational technology is viewed as a transformative instrument, yet gaps in access, digital literacy, and policy capacity indicate a weak orientation toward equity. This study aims to analyze the urgency of reconfiguring digital education policy by positioning youth leadership as a strategic actor. The study adopts a qualitative approach with a conceptual analysis based on a literature review. Data are drawn from policy documents and official publications of reputable international institutions, such as UNESCO, OECD, UNICEF, and the World Bank. Analysis is conducted through thematic analysis and critical policy analysis. The findings show that the digital divide is driven not only by infrastructure limitations, but also by low digital literacy, policy asynchrony, and minimal youth involvement. This study formulates youth leadership–based conceptual solutions, including strengthening the edutech ecosystem, equity-oriented adaptive learning, digital skills credentials, and expanding access in vulnerable regions. Reconfiguring digital education policy based on youth leadership is a strategic prerequisite for the sustainable contribution of digital education to the achievement of the SDGs.

References

  1. Adam, N. F., Widiasmara, B., & Kholifatul Ummah, R. P. (2025). Implementasi manajemen pendidikan di era transformasi digital: a literature review. Journal of Educational Research and Community Service, 1: 204-209. https://journal.nabaedukasi.com/index.php/jercs/article/view/28
  2. Bahrodin, B., Atuti, A. D., & Jalaludin, J. (2025). Evaluasi kebijakan digitalisasi pembelajaran pasca pandemi pada jenjang pendidikan menengah atas. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3642
  3. Barragán Moreno, S. P., & Guzmán Rincón, A. (2025). Digital divide as an explanatory variable for dropout in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(60): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00550-0
  4. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
  5. Burgos, C., Jorquera, R., Aliaga, V., & López, E. (2023). Basic digital competences of university students before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 8: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1201680
  6. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.
  7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.
  9. Cahill, H., Dadvand, B. (2018). Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action. Children and Youth Services Review, 95: 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001
  10. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  11. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2017). Process tracing and the study of youth agency. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(4): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115608175
  12. Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Drljić, K., Čotar Konrad, S., Rutar, S., & Štemberger, T. (2025). Digital equity and sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 17(5): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052011
  14. Gašević, D., Tsai, Y.-S., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). How do we start? An approach to learning analytics adoption in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x
  15. Hanifah, H., Arnyana, I. B. P., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2025). Systematic literature review: Digital technology-based policy approaches to improve quality and access of basic education in developing countries. International Journal Education and Computer Studies, 5(2): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijecs.v5i2.4337
  16. Husnul, N. R. I., Handoyono, E., Rokhman, F. (2025). Transformasi Kebijakan Mutu Pendidikan Berbasis Teknologi di Perguruan Tinggi. Indonesian Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1): 40-48. https://journal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/ijel/article/download/3273/1236/16156
  17. Jayadi, A., Ikawati, H. D., Abdurrahman, A., & Irawan, M. A. (2025). Digital literacy development strategy in higher education institutions. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v10i1.13882
  18. Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4): 49–62. https://www.obeisancebaha.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/6118-17114-1-PB.pdf
  19. Kadian, R., & Rose, V. (2025). Technology enhanced learning and National Education Policy 2020: Analytical review of e-content platforms in Indian education. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v9i4.39
  20. KC, D., KC, P., Rado, I., & Vichit-Vadakan, N. (2025). Digital inequality and learning outcomes: Evidence from Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 19677–19702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13570-0
  21. Laila, D., Izzatul, R., & Miftah, M. (2025). Transformasi digital di dunia pendidikan: implementasi dan dampak teknologi pembelajaran. Journal of Science and Technology: Alpha, 1(2): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.70716/alpha.v1i2.172
  22. Lestari, Y. E., Pudin, Y. A., & Wibowo, V. M. (2024). The impact of digital learning policies on educational equity in rural Indonesian schools. International Journal of Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(2): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijeepa.v1i2.74
  23. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Policy Perspectives, No. 98. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/54ac7020-en
  24. OECD. (2021). OECD skills outlook 2021: Learning for life. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ae365b4-en
  25. Pandey, D. (2025). Edtech for equity: Bridging the digital divide in remote education through interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1): 33-41. https://journal.irsyad.org/index.php/J-MUR/article/view/20
  26. Ragin, C. C. (1989). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1835
  27. Rahmani, A. M., Groot, W., & Rahmani, H. (2024). Dropout in online higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(19): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00450-9
  28. Passey, D., Ntebutse, J. G., Abu Ahmad, M. Y., Cochrane, J., Collin, S., Ganayem, A., Langran, E., Mulla, S., Rodrigo, M. M., Saito, T., Shonfeld, M., & Somasi, S. (2024). Populations digitally excluded from education: Issues, factors, contributions and actions for policy, practice and research in a Post-Pandemic era. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29: 1733–1750. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-024-09767-w
  29. Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Sh., M. B. (2020). Digital divide among higher education faculty. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(21): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00191-5
  30. Suratno, U., Nursidi, D., & Cahyanto, I. (2025). The empowerment of digital literacy aspects in education policy: supporting young generation’s preparability for the digital era. Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(2): 587–596. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v3i2.8199
  31. Syed Hamid, S. S., & Sueb, R. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: A conceptual framework in rural education. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences, 28(2): 179-189. https://doi.org/10.24191/gading.v28i2.661
  32. Tikly, L. (2019). Education for sustainable development in the postcolonial world. Comparative Education, 55(4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1622409
  33. UNESCO. (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Education: International Evidence from the Responses to Educational Disruption Survey (REDS). UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380398.locale=en
  34. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education: a Tool on Whose Terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
  35. UNESCO. (2026). Global Education Monitoring Report 2026: Access and Equity, Countdown to 2030. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/JLKL3223
  36. UNICEF & ITU. (2020). How Many Children and Young People Have Internet Access at Home? UNICEF Data. https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-and-young-people-internet-access-at-home-during-covid19/
  37. UNICEF & ITU. (2020). How Many Children and Young People Have Internet Access at Home? Estimating Digital Connectivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/reports/how-many-children-and-young-people-have-internet-access-home-2020
  38. UNICEF. (2021). Reimagining Girls’ Education: Solutions to Keep Girls Learning in Emergencies. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/reports/reimagining-girls-education
  39. UNICEF. (2023). Bridging the Gender Digital Divide. UNICEF Data. https://data.unicef.org/resources/ictgenderdivide/
  40. Unterhalter, E. (2019). The many meanings of quality education: Politics of targets and indicators in SDG 4. Global Policy, 10(1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591
  41. van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers & Education Open, 3: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
  42. van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., van Dijk, Jan A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3): 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
  43. Widiasanti, I. et al. (2025). Kesetaraan akses internet dan tantangan literasi digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(2): 19631–19637. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v9i2.29394
  44. Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications.
  45. World Bank. (2024). Digital Development Overview (policy brief and sector analyses). World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/overview
  46. Yousofi, R., Golzar, J., & Yacoub, O. (2025). Digital divides and bridges: Equity implications of edtech in ESL education. Frontiers in Education, 10: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1590828