Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Strategy to provide Minimum Essential Force (MEF) in facing the current challenges of the global economy

by Taufiqah taufiqah

Abstract

Indonesia’s archipelagic geography and exposure to Indo-Pacific tensions continue to underscore the need for credible defense capabilities. The Minimum Essential Force (MEF) program (2010–2024) concluded with realization of only approximately 65–70% overall (service-specific: Air Force ~51%, Army ~60%, Navy ~76% by 2023–2024 estimates), constrained by low defense spending (consistently 0.7–0.8% of GDP) and global economic pressures including supply-chain disruptions from U.S.–China competition. This qualitative policy analysis examines MEF optimization strategies—budget efficiency, technological modernization, domestic industry development, and international cooperation—while identifying persistent barriers. It addresses the post-2024 transition to Optimum Essential Force (OEF) under the Prabowo administration, filling contextual gaps by integrating recent fiscal trends (2025–2026 budgets) and policy shifts. Key contributions include updated evidence-based recommendations for resource optimization, reduced import dependency, and accelerated self-reliance, with implications for sovereignty, regional stability, and sustainable defense-industrial growth in archipelagic middle-income states.

References

  1. Adestria, E., Almubaroq, H. Z., & Risdhianto, A. (2024). Evaluation of the Minimum Essential Force program on the independence of the Indonesian defense industry. The Management Journal of Binaniaga, 9(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.33062/mjb.v9i02.67
  2. Afrihan, M. D., Sanny, L., Setiadi, N. J., & Gunadi, W. (2024). Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategy: A systematic literature review in the context of globalization. In The 1st International Conference on Creative Design, Business and Society (1st ICCDBS) 2023 (pp. 158–171). KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i32.17434
  3. Ahdiat, A. (2025, October 3). TNI’s Minimum Essential Force has not met its target by 2024. Databoks (Katadata Insight Center). https://databoks.katadata.co.id/en/economics-macro/statistics/68df7e669aa06/tnis-minimum-essential-force-has-not-met-its-target-by-2024
  4. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2024). Laporan akhir kelompok kerja analisis dan evaluasi hukum di bidang politik, hukum, keamanan, dan kesejahteraan rakyat. [Report]. https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/laporan_akhir_pokja_ae_pertahanan_negara_2024_final.pdf
  5. Bureau of Industry and Security. (2022, October 13). Implementation of additional export controls: Certain advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items; supercomputer and semiconductor end use; entity list modification. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21658/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor
  6. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  7. Collin, K. S. L. (2015). What next for the Indonesian navy? Challenges and prospects for attaining the Minimum Essential Force by 2024. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(3), 432-462. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24916612
  8. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
  9. Janes. (2024, August 20). Indonesia proposes IDR165 trillion defence budget for 2025. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/industry/indonesia-proposes-idr165-trillion-defence-budget-for-2025
  10. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Politik dan Keamanan Republik Indonesia. (2025, June 24). Penguatan postur pertahanan dengan konsep Optimum Essential Force. https://polkam.go.id/penguatan-postur-pertahanan-dengan-konsep-optimum-essential-force/
  11. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Defence white paper 2015. https://www.kemhan.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/BPPI-ENGLISH-2015.pdf
  12. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2025, October 20). Satu tahun pemerintahan Indonesia, bangun pertahanan kuat, mandiri, dan bermartabat. https://www.kemhan.go.id/2025/10/20/satu-tahun-pemerintahan-indonesia-bangun-pertahanan-kuat-mandiri-dan-bermartabat.html
  13. Kennedy, P. S. J. (2023). Indonesian defense industry and Minimum Essential Force. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(2), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I2P116
  14. Matthews, R., Maharani, C., Jupriyanto, & Wu, S. S. (2025). Indonesia’s defense acquisition strategy. Asian Security, 21(2), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2025.2527088
  15. Menteri Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Pertahanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2015 tentang imbal dagang, kandungan lokal, dan ofset dalam pengadaan alat peralatan pertahanan dan keamanan dari luar negeri. https://www.kemhan.go.id/pothan/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Permenhan-No.-30-Tahun-2015-ttg-Ofset.pdf
  16. Menteri Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pertahanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2024 tentang imbal dagang, kandungan lokal, dan/atau ofset dalam pengadaan alat peralatan pertahanan dan keamanan dari luar negeri. https://peraturan.go.id/files/permenhan-no-6-tahun-2024.pdf
  17. Populi Center. (2025, December 10). Mewujudkan interoperabilitas Perisai Trisula Nusantara. https://populicenter.org/2025/12/10/mewujudkan-interoperabilitas-perisai-trisula-nusantara/
  18. Reuters. (2024, December 2). US targets China’s chip industry with new restrictions. https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-targets-chinas-chip-industry-with-new-restrictions-2024-12-02/
  19. Reuters. (2026, March 3). Indonesia will keep budget deficit below 3% of GDP as Middle East conflict lifts oil prices, minister says. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesia-will-keep-budget-deficit-below-3-gdp-middle-east-conflict-lifts-oil-2026-03-03/
  20. SIPRI. (2025). Trends in world military expenditure, 2024 (SIPRI Fact Sheet). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/2504_fs_milex_2024.pdf
  21. Straus, S. G., Lewis, M. W., Connor, K., Eden, R., Boyer, M. E., Marler, T., Carson, C. M., Grimm, G. E., & Smigowski, H. (2019). Collective simulation-based training in the U.S. Army: User interface fidelity, costs, and training effectiveness (RR-2250). RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2250.html
  22. Tadjdeh, Y. (2015, January 29). Study: Virtual simulation training can reduce costs, improve readiness. National Defense Magazine. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2015/1/29/study-virtual-simulation-training-can-reduce-costs-improve-readiness
  23. World Bank. (2026). Military expenditure (% of GDP)-Indonesia (Indicator MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=ID
  24. Yaffid, R., Saputro, G. E., & Suwarno, P. (2026). Between ambition and fiscal reality: Strategic environment, budgeting, and military modernization in Indonesia (2020–2025). PPSDP: International Journal of Education, 5(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v5i1.808