Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Advanced digital literacy: Analysis of student readiness in facing generative AI

by Indrawati Syamsuddin , Verawati Verawati , Ilhamurrahman M Hubaib ORCID
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence technology, particularly generative artificial intelligence (generative AI), has brought about significant changes, especially in higher education. This condition requires students not only to understand the use of basic digital tools but also to master advanced digital literacy, which includes evaluative, strategic, and adaptive abilities in response to technological automation. This study aims to explore students’ readiness to master advanced digital literacy and identify the factors influencing it. This study employed a qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving students in the Civic Education Study Program at Halu Oleo University. The findings show that students demonstrate high readiness to utilize AI for academic needs and technological adaptation. However, this readiness is not balanced with adequate information validation abilities, understanding AI mechanisms, and awareness of digital ethics. These findings align with advanced digital literacy theories that emphasize the evaluative, ethical, and critical aspects of modern technology use. The tables included in this study reinforce the pattern that students’ readiness tends to be stronger in operational aspects but weaker in reflective and evaluative ones. This study contributes to the development of a more adaptive advanced digital literacy learning model in higher education for the generative AI ecosystem.

References

  1. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2022). Introduction to information science. Facet Publishing. https://digital.casalini.it/9781783304967.
  2. Belshaw, D. (2012). The essential elements of digital literacies. EdTech Books. https://dougbelshaw.com/essential-elements-book.pdf.
  3. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2022). The Digital Competence Framework 2.2: Developing digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376.
  4. Hughes, C., Tzirides, A. O., & Saini, A. K. (2024). A quantitative investigation of graduate student perceptions of human-generated and AI-generated reviews in a cyber-social learning platform. In D. Kourkoulou, A. O. Tzirides, B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Trust and inclusion in AI-mediated education (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64487-0_10.
  5. Islam, S., Islam, M., Tamanna, A. K., Sakib, Md. N., Aziz, A. L., & Fahlevi, M. (2025). The potential of online learning: investigating pre-use expectations, intentions, actual use and post-use outcomes in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Cogent Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2500157.
  6. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727.
  7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020.
  8. Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
  9. Sakib, M. N., Islam, M., Fahlevi, M., Rahman, M. S., Younus, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Factors influencing users’ intention to adopt ChatGPT based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 6, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100204
  10. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of IT: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540