Priviet Social Sciences Journal

Cross-generational comparative analysis of educators communication patterns: A case study at SMPN 2 Selat, Karangasem, Bali

by Ahmad Rofiki Rahman ORCID , Fenysia Alfiana
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026

Abstract

This study examines the comparative communication patterns of Generation X, Generation Y (Millennials), and Generation Z teachers in the context of Natural Science (IPA) instruction at SMPN 2 Selat, Karangasem, Bali. The presence of multiple generations in school environments creates distinct communication dynamics that influence the effectiveness of classroom interactions and students’ learning experiences. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documents. The analysis was conducted using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which involves data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal significant generational differences in verbal and nonverbal communication, technology use, and teacher–student interaction styles. Generation X teachers exhibit formal, structured, and authoritative communication with a limited integration of digital media. Generation Y teachers employ a more balanced, interactive, and expressive communication approach, supported by the moderate use of technology. Meanwhile, Generation Z teachers demonstrate highly dynamic, informal, and technology-intensive communication styles that foster horizontal and student-centered interaction. These differences reflect the influence of generational characteristics on instructional communication and indicate that cross-generational diversity enriches pedagogical practices rather than hindering them. This study contributes to educational communication research by offering empirical insights into how generational identity shapes communication behavior in classroom settings, particularly in nonurban schools. The findings also have practical implications for designing teacher professional development programs that accommodate generational differences in communicative competencies.

References

  1. Cresswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (M. O’Heffernan (ed.); 5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
  2. Devito, J. A. (2013). The Interpersonal Communication Book. In The Speech Teacher (Vol. 21, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527209377915
  3. Giles, H. (2025). Theoretical Approaches to Communicative Practices in the Study of Intergenerational Communication and Aging. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 101(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150241297398
  4. Hatzir, N. A., & Segev, E. (2023). Intergenerational Communication: The Meaning of Communication Channels and Their Affordances. Journal of Family Communication, 23(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2126476
  5. Juliano, S. (2015). Komunikasi Dan Gender : Perbandingan Gaya Komunikasi Dalam Budaya Maskulin Dan Feminim. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 5(01). https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v5i01.153
  6. Kristiyanti, E. I., & Muhyadi, M. (2015). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Perempuan. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v3i1.6270
  7. Lestari, A. D., & Yulianita, N. (2025). Gap Generation: Differences in Perspectives and Communication Styles. Jurnal Komunikatio, 11(1), 47–54.
  8. Mardati, Q. N., Munanjar, A., & Syahril, R. (2025). Gaya Komunikasi Sutradara dalam Mengelola Koordinasi Antar Tim Produksi dan Talent pada Sinetron Terlanjur Indah. JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin, 04(01), 771–786.
  9. Mea, F. (2024). Peningkatan Efektivitas Pembelajaran melalui Kreativitas dan Inovasi Guru dalam Menciptakan Kelas yang Dinamis. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 4(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.59404/ijce.v4i3.190
  10. Mehra, P., & Nickerson, C. (2019). Organizational communication and job satisfaction: what role do generational differences play? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 524–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2017-1297
  11. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://repositori.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/149484/qualitative-data-analysis-a-methods-sourcebook-3-e-.html
  12. Mulyana, D. (2017). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  13. Norton, R. (1983). Communicator Style: Theory, Applications, and Measures (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://archive.org/details/communicatorstyl0000nort/page/n5/mode/2up
  14. Puspita, A. (2022). Komunikasi Interpersonal Orang Tua Dalam Pencegahan Pernikahan Dini Terhadap Anak Usia Remaja Di Kecamatan Banjarmasin Selatan. Jurnal Mutakallimin : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31602/jm.v5i2.8903
  15. Putra, Y. S. (2016). Theroritical Review : Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Among Makarti, 1(1), 122–134. http://www.biblioteca.pucminas.br/teses/Educacao_PereiraAS_1.pdf%0Ahttp://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/publicacoes/rbcs_00_11/rbcs11_01.htm%0Ahttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/7845/1/td_2306.pdf%0Ahttps://direitoufma2010.files.wordpress.com/2010/
  16. Rahman, A. R., & Astriani, A. (2023). Komunikasi Krisis Polri dalam Meningkatkan Reputasi dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Pascatragedi Sepak Bola di Kanjuruhan , Malang. 10(02), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.22236/komunika.v10i2.11042
  17. Solaja, M., Idowu, E., & James, E. (2016). Exploring the relationship between leadership communication style, personality trait and organizational productivity. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm11-8480
  18. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Co.
  19. Sugiyono, & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. CV Alfabeta.
  20. Wijaya, A. A., & Naryoso, A. (2017). Komunikasi Interpersonal Lintas Generasi Untuk Menghadapi Stres Akademik Pada Anak. Interaksi Online, 18(2), 1–7.
  21. Zam, E. M. (2021). Peran Literasi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v1i1.176